Kolkata Case Updates: CBI gets important evidence in Kolkata case - Supreme Court, victim's photo and video are being used through AI!

Kolkata Case RG Kar Hospital Supreme Court Hearing Updates: The Kolkata case was heard in the Supreme Court on Monday. During this, the Chief Justice said, "The CBI presented the fourth status report on September 30. It gives details of the steps taken in the investigation and the clues. The CBI is also investigating financial irregularities along with the rape-murder case. The CBI has found some important evidence.

Kolkata Case Updates: The family of the victim of the Kolkata incident has alleged that the victim's video is being uploaded on social media using AI. The Supreme Court issued strict guidelines regarding this. The court has banned the use of photos and videos of the victim on all social media platforms including Wikipedia. The court has directed the IT Ministry to appoint a nodal officer for this. During this, the court said - We have seen the CBI report. Some important clues have been found in the investigation.

The court said- we saw the report, CBI got some important clues in the investigation

The Solicitor General assured that a nodal officer will be appointed to monitor social media to remove all such posts, photographs and videos. A bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Mishra heard the case. On September 17, they said that they were upset with the findings given in the CBI's status report in this case, but refused to give details. The court said - We have seen the report, the CBI has found some important clues in the investigation.

The Chief Justice said, "The CBI presented the fourth status report on September 30. It gives details of the steps taken in the investigation and the clues. The CBI is also investigating financial irregularities along with the rape-murder case."

What has happened in the case so far?

The CBI is investigating the Kolkata rape-murder case and financial irregularities. The CBI has arrested Sanjay Rai in the rape-murder case, while former principal Sandip Ghosh, Abhijit Mandal and many others have been arrested on charges of negligence in this case.

CBI said that Sandeep Ghosh had given wrong information for some reason and deliberately misled the investigation. CBI's investigation revealed that accused Sandeep Ghosh did not want to register an FIR in this case. It was also revealed that he did not reach the college even after getting the information at 9.58 am. The college's vice principal had told the police about suicide. Now the question arises that when he was not involved in this case, then why was he providing wrong information to the police? Was it so that the college is not defamed and its financial irregularities are not revealed?

Sandeep Ghosh's statement on some important issues related to this case was misleading. The CFSL report of the polygraph test states that Sandeep Ghosh deliberately tried to mislead the investigators on some important issues.

Even after Dr. Sandeep Ghosh got information about this case at around 10 am, he did not reach the college. Sandeep Ghosh did not complain about the murder. Finally the vice principal complained and he also told the police that it was a suicide, while the scattered evidence at the crime scene was testifying something else.

The CBI said that the accused deliberately registered a case of unnatural death and deliberately recorded wrong facts. Was the intention of Sandip Ghosh and Abhijit Mandal to save Sanjay Roy? This also remains a question.

The CBI claimed that the accused deliberately delayed filing the FIR. He got information about the incident at 10:03 am. Even after getting the green signal from the deceased's family at 7:30 pm, the FIR was filed at 11:30 pm, causing a delay of about 14 hours.

Abhijit Mandal did not videograph the process of sealing evidence and samples. He hurriedly allowed the cremation even though the family had demanded a second post-mortem. Accused Abhijit Mandal delayed preserving the clothes worn by the accused on the day of the crime by 2 days.